“Ask the Mayor” town hall inspires little confidence for stopping the rising youth murder rate in Seattle.

Whats the Number

A question was asked from the audience, “Mr. Mayor, what is the number?”

The man at the microphone continued the question, “Prior to Sunday night’s murder of yet another inner city youth, the Mayor’s office had received a proposal for the establishment of a Department of Inner City Affairs.  The proposal (as written) is strongly supported by this hurting community; yet the Mayor’s office has failed to respond to the proposal or even engage in basic dialogue with the proposal’s steering committee. “

“8 dead youth in the last 3 months, and 16 overall killings in the area; and still the Mayor and City Council refuse to think outside of the box. They continue to push that their way is best, despite the continued loss of life.”

“So my question is what number of murdered children are the Mayor and the City Council waiting to see before they accept help in solving this problem?”

The Mayor’s response, although sincere, seemed to echo sound bites from the City Council address, “pre-K education, neighborhood policing, jobs for the area.”  In other words, we’ll keep the status quo; nothing to see here… move along people, move along.

“…those involved in these existing programs admit this “assessment” is just a rehash of the previous mayor’s ideas.”

Mayor Murray went on to say that he is seeking input from other mayor’s outside of Seattle, looking for ideas on the best way to curb the violence.  Again, genuinely seeking answers to the problem of continued violence and record youth murder rates over the last 3 months.  But the idea of soliciting voices from other city mayors caused some in the crowd to wonder why we are asking for advice from those outside of the city while failing to engage the community itself on the issue of a Department of Inner City Affairs.

Sounding like a man of action, the mayor promised a “complete assessment of crime prevention programs targeting and helping 18-30 year olds.”  However, even those involved in these existing programs admit this “assessment” is just a rehash of the previous mayor’s ideas and opportunity to increase funding of already operating programs; successful in reaching some “at-risk” youth, but doing little to reach those who are responsible for the rise in violence and murder. 

“…to think these kids can be reached the same way and with the same program shows how far removed the Mayor and this City Council are from what is happening at street level.”

Neither the Mayor nor the Council members grasp the fact that the kids involved in the recent violence and murders are not being reached by existing programs.  For city leaders to think that the kid who was arrested for shoplifting and is now painting murals with the city’s violence prevention program has the same mentality as the kid who shot at another youth in front of the mini-mart because he was “disrespected” or is “doing-dirt” to get a name for himself… to think these kids can be reached in the same manner and with the same program shows how far removed the Mayor and this City Council are from what is happening at street level. The Mayor and the City Council don’t understand that there is a sliding scale on the at-risk spectrum; and that the needs, wants, and desires of at-risk youth change from one teen to the next.  Despite making for good headlines, the rehashing and increased funding of the same old departments will make no significant progress in stopping the rise of violent crime and murder in the Central District and Rainier Valley.

“The Mayor and the City Council don’t understand that there is a sliding scale on the at-risk spectrum; and that the needs, wants, and desires of at-risk youth change from one teen to the next.”

Those affected by this violence are demanding more substance and fresh ideas.  The Mayor says he wants to “change the narrative” in how the neighborhoods and public safety officials communicate; but so far, critics say there they’ve seen no real blueprint for how the city plans to do that.  What the Mayor appears to be saying (or at least thinking) is that there is a one-size fits all “at-risk youth” demographic, which is being taken care of by the programs already in place.

One thing everyone agrees is a positive is that the mayor’s plan does continue the relationships previously  established by former Mayor’s Nickels and McGinn, such as partnering with the community, local businesses, local sports teams, and faith-based organizations to discourage the “no-snitch” code” and build a more trusting relationship between these communities and public safety officers.  These programs should be celebrated for the good that they do; but the Mayor needs to understand that there is a component missing; and that piece is filled by the Department of Inner City Affairs liaison position.

“…what number of murdered children are the Mayor and the City Council waiting to see before they accept help in solving this problem?”

The previous Mayor, Michael McGinn had a very high level of respect within the Rainier Valley and Central District communities because of his heavy involvement in youth programming and innovative approach to working with inner city community youth advocates.  However, if even under Mayor McGinn the programs were unable to reach the youth responsible for the increase in violence and murders.  Why then, would Mayor Murray believe that somehow the results of these programs will change now that he is at the helm?  Does he know something that those living in the community for generations don’t?

Until Mayor Murray and the City Council are willing to open their minds to the idea that there is another way to address the problem, the violence and murder will continue; and we will ask again and again, “What is the number?”


Arts program and Rainier Valley OG’s ambitious plan to stop out of control youth murder rate.


June 20, 2014 – Youth Arts program Unified Outreach has put forth an ambitious proposal for the creation of a new department within the Mayor’s office. The new Department of Inner-City Affairs would address issues specific to Seattle’s Central District and Rainier Valley in order to assist in reducing the amount of criminal activity in Seattle with the use of “outside the box” youth programming and community liaisons that will be proactive in preventing violence, advancing race & social justice issues, and providing a mutually-beneficial partnership with Seattle’s public safety officers to provide previously unattainable neighborhood resources when crimes do occur.

This coalition has dedicated themselves to finding a solution to the violence. With 7 youths dead at the hands of other kids, 15 overall killings, and nearly 50 reports of gunshots in the CD and Rainier Valley since spring began this is something most in Seattle have never experienced; and certainly not expected in our peaceful Northwest Mecca.

However, for most of the untouched areas of Seattle business goes on as usual; with a Seattle media seemingly out of touch with what is happening (one paper referring to the recent epidemic of shootings as “few injuries reported” despite the 7 dead kids), and city leadership that ranges from oblivious to the problem to disgustingly opportunistic. As for the few city leaders who have shown attention, their ideas for solving the problems are the typical sound bites you’d expect; pre-K education, increase minimum wage, more jobs, and so on. As well intentioned as they are, the ideas are woefully out of touch with the thoughts and minds of those responsible for inciting the violence.

The strange thing is Seattle is no Los Angeles or Chicago; Seattle isn’t a giant metropolis where the hotspots of violence can span a hundred miles; no, our hotspots are along 23rd Avenue South and Rainier Ave S., really just a few square miles. Sadly, and without doubt the same mothers and father who have lost children to this violence work in and around city hall, frequent the same coffee shops and sandwich stores; yet city business goes on as though nothing is out of the ordinary. This is why a Department of Inner-City Affairs is needed!

The proposed idea works like this;

Within every youth community there are “networks” operating; kids who have formed communities-within-communities based on common interests. Within urban communities we see an even closer kinship between youth who bond over artistic interests; kids who envision a career selling millions of albums rapping know the other kids in the city who share that dream. The break-dancers know who the other break-dancers are; the graffiti artists know who the graffiti artists are. These communal groups can be a great resource if we have the right liaison between the youth and our community leaders/authorities.

One thing about youth crime and violence is that SOMEONE knows something. The kids know who is doing what in the community; so the question is how does that information come to light?

Obtaining information from kids can be a complicated task. There is no doubt that the knowledge of who has committed the crime (violent or otherwise) is generally known in the community. But because of community loyalty, the mistrust of those in authority, or the fear of reprisal, many witnesses are afraid to come forward.

Unified Outreach, along with the community elders involved in the proposal have put their experience growing up in these communities and continuing to work with low income and at-risk youth to work; believing many low income and at-risk youth are more responsive to those in the (shared) artistic body, and those seen as old school/OG’s (original gangsters) who have established themselves in the neighborhood.

The same kid that is hesitant to share knowledge of a known criminal act with a parent, teacher, or police officer will easily share that information in casual conversation with their breakdance instructor or one of the OG’s at a neighborhood picnic.

The proposals idea is that those OG’s that are also active in the artistic field be recruited to act as liaisons between the city’s at-risk youth and the city community leaders/authorities. Community leaders such as Pastor Ray Rogers, Dr. James Croone, Tyrone Dumas, and many more who have a 20/30+ year history in these neighborhoods and are “neighborhood famous” in Seattle’s CD and South-end of Seattle are needed. These are respected elders you can find at neighborhood barbeques and community events and when they speak the kids listen.

These community elders are artists and arts administrators in their own right; hosting musical performances, parties, and community events where youth engagement occurs. Events where troubled youth are recognized, conflicts resolved, lives set straight; yet these events will never be approved for a Department of Neighborhoods or Office of Arts & Culture Youth Arts grant because they don’t fit the Arts Commission’s idea of what an artist looks or sounds like. The same type-A personality, the direct speaking style, the same REALNESS that makes these people attractive to our youth are seen as negatives by Seattle’s artistic gate-keepers and turned away from receiving artistic and community grants. So the key is to design program partnerships that recruit these OG’s and back their programs; with the understanding that there is an open communication and true working partnership with the select branches of law enforcement, courts, and other areas of public safety. There is confidence that Unified Outreach has a blueprint for such a partnership; an achievable plan to save lives.

The City of Seattle already spends millions of tax payer dollars each year on youth arts, sports, and technology programs. Many of these programs are already making a difference in the lives of our children; however, in order to meet today’s needs it is obvious we must try something different.

Currently the Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs has a budget of $8.5 million, and the Department of Neighborhoods has a budget of $12.4 million (combined nearly $21 million). Not surprisingly, these departments often have a surplus (Large Project Fund is one example). The proposal suggests 20% from each Department be allocated to the Department of Inner City Affairs in order to support a new Department operating under the guidelines that have been provided in this memo.

What is the value of a human life? Are the 7 lives lost worth less because they are kids from the Central District and Rainier Valley? $5.3 million per year towards the DOICA is reasonable and the return each year in the lives saved cannot be measured. If city leaders can put $21 million each year to simply “enrich through art” the lives of those in Seattle, isn’t it worth $5.3 million to actually SAVE those same lives? Would it be a more palatable program if it funded programs in Magnolia? Queen Anne? Lake Union? These are hard questions that deserve answers.

The proposal is a viable solution to reducing crime and providing safer streets. However, because it is a new and unique approach to solving the problem it is bound to encounter pushback from the status quo; and as such will need visionary leaders to champion this as we move forward. Seattle’s leadership must get out of its comfort zone and begin engaging in a more indigenous form of youth outreach, which requires bringing in oversight that understands the working relationship between this new style of community leader (OG’s), and at-risk youth.

Unified Outreach believes the program can be a success; if city leaders take care to avoid the common mistake of just throwing money at the problem. City leaders have to resist the urge to simply throw money at “established youth, arts, and community programs” in the area who may produce fine programming but do not know how to reach our target audience; and who (once they have received the special funding) will simply hire the same old friends & family and list them as “Special Consultants”. Not every person living in the CD and Rainier Valley for decades is respected by the community. Also, there are many artists and arts/programs already operating that don’t reach the kids we are talking about. We need to recruit REAL community-leader OG’s that have a PROVEN history of working with our YOUTH. The people living in the neighborhoods that are being affected by this wave of violence KNOW who the people are that are working to make a difference. The creation of a Department of Inner-City Affairs (DOICA) within the City of Seattle Mayor’s office, with the RIGHT people in leadership roles CAN and WILL save lives.

Proposed Department of Inner-City Affairs Mission Statement

“City of Seattle’s commitment to reducing violence and promoting justice for every community.”Image